re:constitution
2021/ 2022

Katalin Sulyok

Mobility Phase: Sorbonne University | Aarhus University

Countering Short-Termism: Creating New Rights-holders to Protect Long-term Environmental Interests in Europe

Dr. Katalin Sulyok is an Assistant Professor at ELTE University, Budapest. She holds a Ph.D. in law, a Bachelor’s degree in Biology and earned an LL.M. degree from Harvard Law School as a Fulbright scholar. Her main research areas concern international, EU and domestic environmental law issues.

Her English-language PhD thesis was awarded the Henry Wheaton (J.B.Scott) Prize by the Institut de droit international given to the best international environmental law dissertation written in English, German, French, Italian or Spanish in 2018-2019. Her thesis has been published as a monograph entitled “Science and Judicial Reasoning: The Legitimacy of International Environmental Adjudication” in 2021 by Cambridge University Press.

Dr. Sulyok has been a Leibniz Fellow at the Max Planck Institute in Heidelberg, a Visiting Researcher at the Lauterpacht Centre, and a Visiting Scholar in the Center for the Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance of Cambridge University. Dr. Sulyok has also been working as a chief legal advisor to the Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations since 2014.

Countering Short-Termism: Creating New Rights-holders to Protect Long-term Environmental Interests in Europe

Democratically elected legislatures across Europe are often hesitant to impose strict environmental protection measures as they answer to their constituencies, who traditionally favour immediate economic prosperity over long-term environmental benefits. This creates a political-legal climate dominated by short-termism. This is conducive to a system, where long-term environmental interests are routinely overridden by the gains of present stakeholders.

In the hypotheses of this research, the failures of such a decision-making paradigm could only be effectively remedied by creating new rights-holders, whose legally articulated interests can pose binding constraints for the discretion of the majority in the balancing of short-term and long-term interests. This project interrogates developments in European domestic laws and domestic caselaw to appraise the extent and ways in which the judiciary may use existing rightsholders as leverage points to counterbalance short-term interests by giving equal normative weight to their long-term rights and needs in environmental litigation. This research thus surveys emerging rights-holders in European laws and maps the normative building blocks of a new paradigm of environmental democracy, which would end the disenfranchisement of posterity.